FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

June 2, 2026 

President Trump Revokes Executive Orders Protecting Public Lands from Unmanaged Motorized Recreation 

Repeal threatens wildlife, public safety, and outdoor recreation across federal lands  

Contacts:
Laura Peterson, Senior Attorney, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA); (801) 236-3762; laura@suwa.org

Washington, D.C. – Last Friday, after most people left work for the weekend, President Trump announced the repeal of two executive orders (11644 and 11989) that govern off-road vehicle (OHV) and over-snow vehicle (OSV) use on public lands. He further directed federal land management agencies to rescind or revise their regulations implementing these orders, risking chaos and confusion on public lands across the country. 

For 54 years, these orders have helped protect streams, wildlife and their habitats, and opportunities for safe recreation by providing clear and consistent guidance for motorized and nonmotorized users on Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service, and National Park Service lands. In response, numerous conservation organizations cried foul over this latest attack on public lands. 

Below are quotes and background information:

“These executive orders provided the foundation for common-sense management of motorized vehicles on public lands, recognizing the detrimental impact unmanaged motor vehicles have on cultural sites, wildlife, waterways and other public land users,” said Laura Peterson, Senior Attorney at the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. “In Utah alone, there are tens of thousands of miles of dirt roads and trails open to motorized vehicles. Far from motorized vehicles being kept out of public lands, it’s quite the opposite: it’s the wildlife and visitors trying to picnic or camp with their families that are being chased out at every turn. The impacts of repealing these executive orders will be long-lasting and devastating.” 

“Removing or weakening regulations for properly managing motorized recreation will endanger at-risk fish and wildlife, particularly grizzly bears and bull trout, because off-road vehicles choke streams with dirt and damage sensitive habitats,” said Adam Rissien, rewilding manager with WildEarth Guardians. “Today’s off-road vehicles are even more powerful, more damaging than when the first orders were put in place to protect public lands from unfettered motorized recreation, and removing long-standing protections will only make matters worse.” 

“Nobody wants national parks damaged by off road vehicles. The administration is making sweeping changes that could throw open the doors to unchecked off-road vehicle use that puts at risk the very resources national parks were created to protect,” said  Cory MacNulty, Southwest Region Campaign Director for the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA). “With thousands of miles of roads and trails across public lands already open to off-road vehicles, what is at stake here is not access – it’s the future of the places that Americans love most.”

“Public lands are big enough for hikers, hunters, horseback riders, mountain bikers, motorized users and families looking for quiet places to camp, if we are wise about how we share them,” said Alison Flint, Acting Vice President for Federal Policy at The Wilderness Society. “For more than 50 years, common-sense safeguards have helped land managers reduce conflicts, protect clean water and wildlife habitat, and make sure public lands can be enjoyed by everyone. This administration is working to destroy this foundation, which has been in place since Richard Nixon. This is a cynical attempt to pit public land users against one another while weakening the rules that protect the land itself. Our children and grandchildren deserve public lands that are healthy, shared and cared for—not places where decades of balanced management are tossed aside for special interests.”

“The intent of these executive orders was to minimize environmental damage and user conflict from motorized vehicle use (including snowmobiles) on public lands,” said Anneka Williams, Winter Wildlands Alliance Policy Director. “They were established in the 1970s in response to widespread and increasing off-road vehicle use on public lands to balance motorized and non-motorized recreation and protect natural ecosystems and wildlife. Without these orders, there is no guidance to minimize impacts from motorized recreation, a loss that will have lasting consequences for decades to come.” 

 “This rescission is yet another loss for wildlife and natural places,” said Vera Smith, director of national forests and public lands for Defenders of Wildlife. “Removing common-sense tools for managing all-terrain vehicles, dirt bikes and other off-road vehicles on public lands is reckless and nonsensical.”

“If you want to make the public land experience worse for everyone – motorized and non-motorized – blowing up travel management is a good place to start,” said Hilary Eisen, federal policy director at Wild Montana. “It’s how we keep public lands working for everyone. These EOs are the foundation land managers rely on to provide motorized access while protecting wildlife, natural resources, and opportunities for quiet, non-motorized recreation. Getting rid of them to satisfy a tiny minority of users just invites more use conflict, makes public lands more dangerous, and degrades public lands and waters. This is a reckless move that could set off a chain reaction that undermines everything we love about our public lands.”

“Recreationists of all types enjoy camping next to clean mountain streams, seeing wildlife, and enjoying the great outdoors with their friends and family. Public lands managers have relied on the previous executive orders to protect water quality, ensure wildlife have space to roam, and preserve high-quality recreation opportunities for everyone,” said John Robison, public lands and wildlife director at the Idaho Conservation League. “If agencies no longer have to minimize the impacts of motorized recreation to water quality, wildlife, and other recreationists, we are in danger of degrading the very values of our public lands that draw us there again and again. In the end, everyone will be worse off.” 

“Loud engines stress wildlife, displacing them from feeding and breeding areas. Tire damage speeds erosion and harms ecosystems,” said Chris Bachman, Conservation Director at the Yaak Valley Forest Council. “Vehicle tires and undercarriages carry seeds into forests and grasslands, disrupting natural systems and food resources. The Roadless Rule has been rescinded, and every effort is being made to weaken the Endangered Species Act. Now this? This administration appears determined to cause significant harm to our public lands at every turn.”

“As we see in nature, balance needs to be our rule. More and more we are seeing the scales of regulation be tipped wildly in one direction, towards extraction and deregulation of public lands,” said Allison Weber, Policy Director for Friends of the Inyo. “We support the protection of ecosystems and species, and we know that regulation of various activities on public lands are necessary to achieve that goal, to obtain balance between natural and recreational values. Deregulating recreation like OHV use ultimately leads to degradation of the landscapes and the routes themselves, followed by additional labor and money by our public lands agency staff to restore them to working order. If we want to all enjoy these landscapes for years to come, we are moving in the wrong direction.”

“This executive order puts America’s wild places at risk by prioritizing motorized vehicle access over the protection of wildlife, clean water, and public lands. For decades, commonsense safeguards have helped land managers balance motorized recreation with conservation and other types of recreation, ensuring that public lands remain healthy and accessible for everyone,” said Athan Manuel, Director of Sierra Club’s Lands Protection Program. “Eliminating responsible motorized management threatens fragile habitats, increases damage to sensitive landscapes, and undermines the experiences of people seeking quiet recreation in nature. America’s public lands belong to all of us, and future generations deserve the chance to experience wild and thriving places. Instead of weakening protections, we should be strengthening our commitment to conserving the natural heritage that makes these lands so special.”

“For decades off-road vehicles have had an outsized impact on BLM-managed lands and that’s especially true today as faster and louder vehicles blanket the landscape,” said retired BLM Director Jim Baca. Baca served as BLM Director from 1993-94. “ORVs harass wildlife, degrade streams and destroy cultural sites, and are generally a nuisance to other public land visitors. BLM has struggled mightily to control this use and its job has only gotten harder under Trump’s second term as career BLM personnel have been fired and the agency’s budget decimated. Trump’s latest Order – undoing Nixon and Carter-era Executive Orders that directed BLM to ‘minimize’ the impacts these vehicles have on public lands and resources – is only going to make BLM’s job harder at a time when it needs to be doing more than ever to rein in this activity.” 

“Without proper management, off-road vehicles tear up vegetation, disrupt wildlife, damage streams, and lead to conflicts among recreational users,” said Thomas Delehanty, attorney at Earthjustice. “President Trump is discarding the long-standing, common-sense framework for managing off-road vehicle use to cater to a narrow set of interests. Our public lands, streams, and wildlife will pay the price.”

Background

In response to the growing use of dirt bikes, snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, and other off-road vehicles (ORVs), and corresponding environmental damage and conflicts with non-motorized users, Presidents Nixon and Carter issued Executive Orders 11644 and 11989 in 1972 and 1977, respectively. These executive orders require federal land management agencies to plan for ORV use to protect resources and other recreational uses. Specifically, the executive orders require that, when designating areas or trails available for ORV use, the agencies locate them to: 

(1) minimize damage to soil, watershed, vegetation, and other resources of the public lands; 

(2) minimize harassment of wildlife or significant disruption of wildlife habitats; and 

(3) minimize conflicts between off-road vehicle use and other existing or proposed recreational uses of the same or neighboring public lands.

### 
The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA) is a nonprofit organization with members and supporters from around the country dedicated to protecting America’s redrock wilderness. From offices in Moab, Salt Lake City, and Washington, DC, our team of professionals defends the redrock, organizes support for America’s Red Rock Wilderness Act, and stewards a world-renowned landscape. Learn more at www.suwa.org.